A rise in exotic goods: When Jeruslaem was an Assyrian Vassal

A Oxford Journal of Archaeology publication by Reli Avisar examines how vassal kingdoms, elite consumption, and imported luxury goods shaped Iron Age Lachish and Jerusalem.

 Southern wall of the Temple Mount. Archaeological Park in the old city of Jerusalem. (photo credit: Nurlan Mammadzada. Via Shutterstock)
Southern wall of the Temple Mount. Archaeological Park in the old city of Jerusalem.
(photo credit: Nurlan Mammadzada. Via Shutterstock)

A Oxford Journal of Archaeology publication by Reli Avisar examines how vassal kingdoms, elite consumption, and imported luxury goods shaped Iron Age Lachish and Jerusalem. It maps out a surprising economic and political reversal between the two sites.

According to the study, Late Iron IIA Lachish (Level IV) yielded an unusual cache of high-end objects: precious metals like silver and gold foil, semi-precious stone beads, and carved ivory items. Archaeological layers show a thriving elite culture, bolstered by rock-cut chamber tombs that contained plentiful jewelry, pendants, and other luxurious items.

The study proposes these conspicuous consumption patterns may reflect vassalage under Aram-Damascus. While evidence indicates King Hazael’s aggressive expansion across the southern Levant, Lachish appears to have remained intact—likely trading loyalty for wealth. This scenario parallels later Jerusalem, where eighth-century BCE levels reveal a surge of ivory carvings and exotic goods once the city became a prosperous Assyrian vassal.

In contrast, researchers found that Jerusalem’s record in the ninth-century BCE contains fewer imported luxury goods, despite grand construction projects. Meanwhile, Lachish’s fortunes faded in the eighth century BCE as Jerusalem rose in prominence, culminating in a sweeping Assyrian influence that transformed Judah’s capital into a bustling, well-appointed city.

The study underscores how an imperial power’s strategy—handing out prestige items and privileges—could tip a site toward sudden economic growth, only to see its influence wane when power blocs shifted. Scholars say this evidence adds a layer of complexity to how regional centers in the Iron Age southern Levant navigated alliance-building and resource control.

The article was written with the assistance of a news analysis system.