Harvard says Trump admin. is doubling down on demands after sending letter

The Trump administration "appears to have doubled down on those demands through its deeds in recent days," a Harvard spokesperson said.

 U.S. President Donald Trump holds a letter from Britain's King Charles as he meets with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer (not pictured) in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., February 27, 2025. (photo credit: REUTERS/KEVIN LAMARQUE)
U.S. President Donald Trump holds a letter from Britain's King Charles as he meets with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer (not pictured) in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., February 27, 2025.
(photo credit: REUTERS/KEVIN LAMARQUE)

Harvard said on Saturday the Trump administration was "doubling down" on far-reaching demands on the university despite a published report that government officials had sent a letter spelling out those demands without authorization.

The letter from government lawyers, received by Harvard on April 11, was sent before senior officials of US President Donald Trump's administration could approve it or give the go-ahead for its release, the New York Times reported late on Friday, citing unnamed sources familiar with the matter.

Three days after that letter arrived, Harvard rejected numerous demands that it said would amount to the school giving up control over hiring, admissions, and instruction to the government.

The Trump administration subsequently froze $2.3 billion in funding to Harvard and threatened to strip Harvard of its tax-exempt status and take away its ability to enroll foreign students. It also demanded information on the university's foreign ties, students, and faculty.

"Even assuming the administration now wishes to take back its litany of breathtakingly intrusive demands, it appears to have doubled down on those demands through its deeds in recent days," a Harvard spokesperson said. "Actions speak louder than words."

 Demonstrators rally on Cambridge Common in a protest organized by the City of Cambridge calling on Harvard leadership to resist interference at the university by the federal government in Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S. April 12, 2025.  (credit: NICHOLAS PFOSI/REUTERS)
Demonstrators rally on Cambridge Common in a protest organized by the City of Cambridge calling on Harvard leadership to resist interference at the university by the federal government in Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S. April 12, 2025. (credit: NICHOLAS PFOSI/REUTERS)

Since his January inauguration, Trump has cracked down on top US universities, saying they mishandled last year's pro-Palestinian protests and allowed antisemitism to fester on campus.

Columbia University was an early target, but in recent weeks, the administration has focused on Harvard, where it is seeking oversight of its student body, faculty, and curriculum in an apparent effort to curb what it perceives as the university's liberal bias.

The content of the April 11 letter was authentic, but the New York Times reported differing accounts inside the Trump administration of how it was mishandled.

The newspaper said some at the White House believed the letter was sent prematurely, while others thought it was meant to be first circulated among government officials.

The White House had no immediate comment.

The administration had already sent a list of demands on April 3 to Harvard for the elite school to continue receiving federal funding. These included a mask ban, removal of diversity, equity, and inclusion programs, and more cooperation with law enforcement.

The letter sent to Harvard 

The April 11 letter, signed by officials at the Education Department, Health Department, and General Services Administration, expanded that list. It told Harvard to stop recognizing some pro-Palestinian groups and asked it to report to federal authorities foreign students violating university policies, among other demands.

Harvard had believed it could still avoid confrontation with the Trump administration because they were engaged in dialogue, the newspaper said, but the letter made Harvard feel that a deal was not possible.

Harvard said it did not doubt the letter's authenticity and called its demands "astonishing in their overreach."