High Court: Shasha-Biton must reconsider giving Israel Prize to prof.

The court found no evidence that Prof. Oded Goldreich supported the BDS movement, and that he publically declared his opposition.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and President Reuven Rivlin and Education Minister Yoav Galant attend the Israel Prize ceremony in Jerusalem, prior to Israel's 73 Independence Day, on April 05, 2021.  (photo credit: OLIVIER FITOUSSI/FLASH90)
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and President Reuven Rivlin and Education Minister Yoav Galant attend the Israel Prize ceremony in Jerusalem, prior to Israel's 73 Independence Day, on April 05, 2021.
(photo credit: OLIVIER FITOUSSI/FLASH90)

The High Court of Justice ordered Education Minister Yifat Shasha-Biton to reconsider her decision to deny Prof. Oded Goldreich the Israel Prize because of allegations that he supports boycotts of Israel.

According to all three justices on the panel, the evidence suggests that Goldreich publicly declared he currently rejects the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) campaign, and that any statements that could be construed differently he signed on to in the past and were not one-sided.

Based on that, Justices Noam Sohlberg, Yael Wilner and Yitzhak Amit suggested on Thursday that Shasha-Biton reconsider her decision.

Amit added he would have vetoed Shasha-Biton’s old decision and granted Goldreich the prize since he was approved by the non-political Israel Prize committee, and the award should remain non-political other than in much more extreme cases.

Amit agreed with Attorney-General Avichai Mandelblit, especially since Goldreich is a math professor who does not teach politics.

However, Sohlberg and Wilner said they wanted to avoid forcing Shasha-Biton to grant the prize, and preferred to give her a chance to reconsider in light of their factual findings.

In July, Shasha-Biton informed the High Court that she was upholding the earlier decision of her predecessor, Yoav Gallant, who had vetoed awarding the prize to Goldreich due to his alleged support for BDS.

The initial decision by Gallant in June to deny Goldreich the award came after right-wing group Im Tirzu published a report that found Goldreich’s signature on a petition in which he and 522 others called for a  boycott on academic institutions in Judea and Samaria, the most notable of which is Ariel University.

The report also focused on a 2019 letter that he signed, along with 240 Israeli and Jewish academics, calling on the German government to reject a resolution that equates the BDS movement with antisemitism.

The letter also urged Germany to continue funding organizations, including pro-BDS NGOs, that “peacefully challenge the Israeli occupation” and “expose severe violations of international law.”


Stay updated with the latest news!

Subscribe to The Jerusalem Post Newsletter


“Prof. Goldreich does not currently meet the conditions for contributing to the State of Israel, as his contribution to the state through his research is offset by his vigorous activity to boycott Israeli research institutions – an activity that is constantly and deliberately done and continues to cause real harm to Israeli academia,” Gallant wrote to Mandelblit on Friday.

In addressing Goldreich’s stance on Ariel University, Gallant said that “Ariel University is not a political institution: its activities are not aimed at achieving a political goal but at advancing research and science,” and that “its geographical location does not exclude it or delegitimize it from the ranks of academic institutions in Israel. Anyone who calls for the boycott of Ariel and even works on the issue does not take a political position, but acts deliberately and consciously to weaken Israeli academia.”

In contrast, others have viewed Goldreich’s views as mere opposition to Ariel University and support for human rights NGOs in Israel, and not an endorsement of the broader BDS campaign.

Jerusalem Post Staff contributed to this report.