Most dogs can easily learn to sit, stand, or come when you tell it to, thus it’s not surprising that canines can understand and respond to human words. Some highly intelligent dogs have been taught over a hundred words that they recognize and obey.
But a new study from Hungary has made the surprising discovery by recording brain activity that dogs generally also know that certain words “stand for” certain objects. When they hear those words, they activate a matching mental representation in their minds.
“Dogs don’t react with a learned behavior to certain words,” said Marianna Boros of the ethology department at the Eötvös Loránd University in Budapest. “They also don’t just associate that word with an object based on temporal contiguity without really understanding the meaning of those words, but they activate a memory of an object when they hear its name.”
Word understanding tests with infants and animals that don’t speak usually require active choice, the researchers explained. They’re asked to show or get an object after hearing its name. Very few dogs do well on such tests in the lab, often fetching objects correctly at the same rate as expected by chance.
In the new study, the researchers wanted to look closer at dogs’ implicit understanding of object words by measuring brain activity using non-invasive electroencephalogram (EEG). The idea was that this might offer a more-sensitive measure of their understanding of language. They have just published their findings in the journal Current Biology under the title “Neural evidence for referential understanding of object words in dogs.”
They had 18 dog owners say words for toys their dogs knew and then present the objects to them. Sometimes they presented the matching toy while other times they would present an object that didn’t match. For example, an owner would say, “Zara, look – a ball!” and presented the object while the dog’s brain activity was captured on EEG.
Brain patterns and word recognition
The brain recording results showed a different pattern in the brain when the dogs were shown a matching object versus a mismatched one, similarly to what we see in humans and what is widely accepted as evidence that they understand the words. The researchers also found a greater difference in those patterns for words that dogs knew better, offering further support for their understanding of object words. While the researchers thought this ability might depend on having a large vocabulary of object words, their findings showed that it doesn’t.
“Because dogs generally learn instruction words rather than object names and there are only a handful of dogs with a large vocabulary of object words, we expected that dogs’ capacity for referential understanding of object words will be linked to the number of object words they know; but it wasn’t,” said Lilla Magyari, also of Eötvös Loránd University and University of Stavanger.
Using words to refer to objects in the environment is a core feature of the use of human language. Referential understanding assumes the formation of mental representations of these words. Such understanding of object words has not yet been shown to exist until now as a general capacity in any non-human species despite multiple behavior-based case reports.
Dogs are thought to be exceptional among animals in their social-communicative capacities toward humans – and as companion animals, they live in an environment rich in language and objects. language- and object-rich environment. Behavioral reports on whether dogs understand that words can refer to objects are indecisive: they suggest that a few dogs can learn a high number of object words after a few exposures but also that most dogs fail to do so even after extensive training. Nevertheless, performance measures that impose additional task demands (such as attentional or training requirements may be insensitive to reveal certain cognitive abilities, the researchers wrote.
“It doesn’t matter how many object words a dog understands, known words activate mental representations anyway, suggesting that this ability is generally present in dogs and not just in some exceptional dogs that know the names of many objects,” Boros added.
The discovery that dogs as a species generally may have a capacity to understand words in a referential way just like humans do might reshape the way scientists think about the uniqueness of how humans use and understand language, the researchers suggested. That has important implications for theories and models of language evolution. For dog owners, it’s an important realization also.
“Your dog understands more than he or she shows signs of,” Magyari said. “Dogs are not merely learning a specific behavior to certain words, but they might actually understand the meaning of some individual words as humans do.”
The researchers are now curious to know if this ability to understand referential language is specific to dogs or might be present in other mammals as well. Either way, they’re curious how this ability emerged and whether it depends on dogs’ unique experience of living with people. They also want to know why, if dogs understand object words, more of them don’t show it.